⚠ Evidence Notice
The "myths vs facts" framing is not intended to suggest all questions are settled. Some are clearly resolved; others remain subjects of genuine scientific debate. We note where uncertainty exists.

Common Myths and What the Evidence Actually Shows

MYTH

Amalgam fillings constantly leak high amounts of mercury

FACT

False. Amalgam releases small amounts of mercury vapor, primarily during chewing and grinding. Levels in most patients are well below established safety thresholds, though they vary individually.

MYTH

Removing amalgam fillings cures chronic illness

FACT

Unproven. While some patients report improvement after removal, controlled studies have not found consistent evidence that amalgam causes or cures systemic conditions in otherwise healthy adults.

MYTH

Any dentist can safely remove mercury fillings

FACT

Misleading. All removal creates some mercury exposure. Technique matters significantly. Providers using SMART-like protocols with rubber dams and HVE expose patients to substantially less mercury during the procedure.

MYTH

Mercury-free means the same as mercury-safe

FACT

False. Mercury-free means a dentist no longer places new amalgam fillings. Mercury-safe describes careful removal protocol. A dentist can be mercury-free but still remove old fillings without protective measures.

MYTH

Composite fillings are always better than amalgam

FACT

Oversimplified. Composites have advantages (no mercury, tooth-colored) but also limitations (shorter lifespan in some applications, technique-sensitive placement). The best choice depends on clinical context.

MYTH

SMART protocol is 100% safe and eliminates all mercury exposure

FACT

Exaggerated. SMART meaningfully reduces mercury exposure during removal, but it does not eliminate it entirely. All amalgam removal involves some exposure.

← Back to Research Library